Hypnosis Indonesia Training Institute stipulates that student graduation is not merely the completion of study hours , but rather the achievement of clinical competence, professional ethics, and therapeutic integrity that can be internationally accounted for. Therefore, the evaluation and assessment system implemented is not administrative, not loose, and not solely based on attendance, but rather is competency-based assessment .

This evaluation model is designed with reference to and is aligned with the principles of professional evaluation used by international hypnosis and health organizations, including:

• International Association of Counselors and Therapists (IACT)
• National Guild of Hypnotists (NGH)
• General Hypnotherapy Standards Council (GHSC)
• American Hypnosis Association (AHA)

However, Hypnosis Indonesia not just copying, but rather integrate, adapt and raise the standards to suit the clinical, cultural, legal and social responsibility context in Indonesia, without compromising its international quality.

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE INDONESIAN HYPNOSIS EVALUATION SYSTEM

Hypnosis Indonesia evaluation system is built on five main principles which is the foundation of the entire assessment process:

1. PRINCIPLE OF DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCE

Graduation is only given to participants who able to demonstrate hypnosis and hypnotherapy skills in real terms, not just understanding the theory verbally. This principle is in line with the standards IACT dan NGH which emphasizes that a hypnotherapist must be able to:

• Conduct client intake in a professional manner
• Carry out basic clinical assessments
• Perform induction, deepening, and termination safely
• Handling client resistance
• Maintain client psychological safety

Maintain client psychological safety only able to answer theory but unable to carry out clinical practice stated incompetent.

2. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Referring to GHSC and AHA, Hypnosis Indonesia confirms that competence without ethics is dangerous. Therefore, the evaluation not only assesses technical capabilities, but also:

• Understanding competency limits
• Awareness of contraindications
• Ability to refer clients
• Compliance with the code of ethics
• Legal awareness and client safety

Participants who demonstrate manipulative, arrogant, belittling client behavior, or misuse of hypnosis, was immediately declared a failure, even though it is technically capable.

3. PRINCIPLES OF CLINICAL READINESS

Hypnosis Indonesia not pass participants as “therapists” if they do not have minimum clinical readiness, that is:

• Personal emotional stability
• Personal emotional stability
• Ability to deal with emotional clients
• Do not use hypnosis for personal ego needs

This principle goes beyond many training institutions that focus solely on technique, and aligns with the approach clinical orientation in modern international organizations.

4. PRINCIPLES OF MEASURABLE AND TRANSPARENT STANDARDS

Each aspect of the evaluation has:

• Written criteria
• Measurable indicators
• The value is clear
• Objective assessment rubric

There is no judgment based on likes/dislikes, seniority, or personal relationships. This is an adoption of the principle assessment transparency from international standards of professional education.

5. ZERO COMPROMISE PRINCIPLE TOWARDS CLIENT SAFETY

One fatal error in practice (e.g. forcing a traumatized client, ignoring contraindications, or making dangerous suggestions) immediately canceled the graduation, without negotiation.

This principle is in line with safety standards on AHA dan GHSC.

GENERAL FRAMEWORK OF THE EVALUATION SYSTEM

The Indonesian Hypnosis evaluation system consists of six main components which are mutually integrated:

1. Academic Theoretical Evaluation
2. Evaluasi Keterampilan Praktik (Skill-Based Assessment)
3. Evaluation of Professional Attitude & Ethics
4. Integrated Clinical Skills Evaluation
5. Real Case Study Evaluation
6. Professional Readiness Evaluation & Certification

Each component must pass, non-exchangeable, and cannot be compensated for with the value of other components.

Graduation Position in Hypnosis Indonesia

In Hypnosis Indonesia graduation is not a right, but rather trust.

By declaring someone to have passed, the institution morally and professionally states that:

“This person is qualified to handle the psychological conditions of other human beings.”

Therefore, the graduation standards are set stricter than many similar training institutions, and consciously accept the consequences that not all participants will pass.

ACADEMIC THEORETICAL EVALUATION & CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE COMPETENCY TEST OF HYPNOSIS THERAPISTS

Academic theoretical evaluation in Indonesian Hypnosis system not just a test of memorizing concepts, but rather is measurement of depth of clinical understanding, analytical ability, and maturity of therapeutic thinking students. At this stage, participants are tested to see whether they truly understand the material. Why a technique is used, When techniques applied, when it should not be applied, as well as what are the clinical risks.

This standard consciously goes beyond conventional exam models that only assess definitions, terms, or technical steps. The theoretical evaluation of Hypnosis Indonesia is designed to ensure that every participant who passes have a secure cognitive foundation for real clinical practice.

A. PURPOSE OF ACADEMIC THEORETICAL EVALUATION

Academic theoretical evaluation has five main, inseparable objectives:

1. Ensuring a correct conceptual understanding of hypnosis and hypnotherapy
2. Assess clinical and analytical thinking skills
3. Identifying potentially dangerous misconceptions
4. Assess participant readiness to make therapeutic decisions
5. Ensuring client safety through a thorough understanding of theory

Participants who master the technique without understanding the theory considered high risk and not worthy of graduation, because the practice of hypnosis without a strong conceptual foundation has the potential to cause psychological damage to clients.

B. SCOPE OF MATERIAL EVALUATED

B. SCOPE OF EVALUATED MATERIALS the entire core knowledge domain of clinical hypnosis, which are grouped into eight main clusters.

1. Scientific Foundations of Hypnosis

Participants must understand hypnosis as a psychological and neuropsychological phenomenon, not as a myth or mere suggestion. The material evaluated includes:

• Modern psychology-based definition of hypnosis
• The difference between classical hypnosis, directive hypnosis, and clinical hypnosis
• The position of hypnosis in the spectrum of human consciousness
• The role of attention, suggestibility, and expectations

The role of attention, suggestibility, and expectations without using magical, mystical, or pseudo-scientific narratives. The use of unscientific terms is an indicator academic ineligibility.

2. STRUCTURE OF CONSCIOUSNESS & SUBCONSCIOUS MIND

The evaluation assesses participants' understanding of:

• The difference between conscious, subconscious, and automatic processes
• Protective function of the subconscious mind
• Psychological resistance mechanisms
• The relationship between suggestion and belief systems

Participants must be able to explain why clients can reject suggestions, as well as how the clinical hypnosis approach works , as well as how the clinical hypnosis approach works, not against it.

3. BRAIN WAVES & HYPNOTIC STATE

This material is not assessed as frequency memorization, but rather as functional understanding. Participants are evaluated on:

• The relationship between brain waves and mental states
• The difference between relaxation conditions, light hypnosis, and deep hypnosis
• Myths surrounding “sleep” in hypnosis
• Clinical implications of hypnotic depth

Clinical implications of hypnotic depth Clinical implications of hypnotic depth and will lose significant value.

4. HYPNOTIC RESPONSE & CLIENT VARIATION

Evaluation assesses understanding of that not all clients react the same to hypnosis. The material includes:

• Variation of suggestibility
• Psychological factors that influence hypnotic response
• The role of trust, anxiety, and self-control
• Common mistakes in blaming the client

Participants must be able to explain that failure of hypnotic response is the therapist's responsibility, not the client's fault.

5. ETHICS, LIMITATIONS, AND CONTRAINDICATIONS

This is one of the most crucial parts. The evaluation includes:

• Principle of informed consent
• Limits of competence of hypnosis therapists
• Conditions that require referral
• Contraindications to hypnosis

Participants who are unable to explain when to reject a client stated not yet feasible for clinical practice.

6. CLINICAL HYPNOSIS VS ENTERTAINMENT HYPNOSIS

Participants are tested to clearly differentiate between:

• Aims of clinical hypnosis
• Risk of misuse of technique
• Differences in ethical responsibilities
• Long-term psychological impact

The blurred understanding between clinical and entertainment hypnosis is an indicator professional immaturity.

7. PROBLEM FORMULATION & THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHESIS

Participants are evaluated on their abilities:

• Identifying the client's core problems
• Distinguishing symptoms and root causes
• Distinguishing symptoms and root causes
• Avoiding personal assumptions

The evaluation in this section uses case-based questions, not a definition question.

8. PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY & RISK MANAGEMENT

Material includes:

• Potential for abreaction
• Client emotional distress
• Basic grounding techniques
• When to stop the session

Participants who consider abreaction as “a normal thing to be allowed” will failed evaluation.

C. FORMS AND METHODS OF THEORETICAL EVALUATION

Theoretical evaluation is not carried out using a single method, but rather through combination of approaches to ensure objectivity and depth of assessment.

1. ANALYTICAL ESSAY WRITTEN EXAM

Participants are required to answer essay questions that require:

• Conceptual explanation
• Case analysis
• Professional argumentation
• Ethical considerations

Short, shallow, or slogan-like answers did not get adequate marks.

2. WRITTEN CASE STUDY

Participants are given a client scenario and asked to:

• Identify the problem
• Determining whether hypnosis is worth using
• Developing an initial approach
• Explain risks and limitations

Assessment focuses on clinical logic, not free creativity.

3. STRUCTURED ORAL EXAM

Oral examinations are conducted to assess:

• Clarity of thinking
• Consistency of understanding
• Ability to explain to lay clients
• Emotional stability when tested

Nervous participants are welcome, but participants who... arrogant, defensive, or dismissive of questions will lose ethical points.

D. THEORETICAL EVALUATION ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

Assessment is carried out using an objective rubric with the following components:

Assessed Aspects	Weight
Conceptual Accuracy	25%
Depth of Analysis	20%
Clinical Logic	20%
Ethical Awareness	20%
Communication Clarity	15%

Minimum passing score: 75/100
However, value below 70 on ethical or safety aspects is automatically declared a failure, even though the total value is sufficient.

E. CRITERIA FOR PASSING AND FAILING THE THEORETICAL EVALUATION

It will be declared PASS if the participant:

• Understanding the scientific concept of hypnosis
• Able to think clinically and ethically
• Demonstrates awareness of competency limits
• Don't have any dangerous misconceptions

It will be declared NOT PASS if the participant:

• Using mystical or pseudo-scientific narratives
• Blaming the client for therapy failure
• Ignore contraindications
• Not understanding the psychological risks

Participants who do not pass must repeat learning, not just a re-examination.

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PRACTICE SKILL BASED ASSESSMENT & DIRECT OBSERVATION OF THERAPIST COMPETENCY

Clinical practice evaluation is the core of Hypnosis Indonesia graduation system. At this stage, all of the participants' theoretical knowledge is tested in real conditions or clinical simulations that closely approximate the reality of professional practice. The main principle in this evaluation is one:

A participant is only declared to have passed if he is safe, competent, and worthy of being trusted to handle other human beings.

Hypnosis Indonesia confirmed that there is no theory-based graduation only, and there is no compromise on client safety. Clinical practice evaluations are designed to answer the following fundamental questions:

• Are participants able to practice hypnosis safely?
• Are participants able to manage real client dynamics?
• Are participants able to maintain ethics under the pressure of practice?
• Are participants able to make appropriate clinical decisions?

A. PHILOSOPHY OF CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION

Evaluation of clinical practice in Hypnosis Indonesia is based on competency-based clinical assessment, not on stage performance, beauty of language, or personal style.

The three main principles underlying this evaluation are:

1. Safety First Principle
   The client's psychological safety is above the success of the technique.
2. Process Over Performance
   What is assessed is not whether the technique is "cool or not", but rather correct clinical process.
3. Ethical Consistency
   Ethics must be consistent even when participants encounter difficult, resistant, or emotional clients.

Participants who demonstrate high technical ability but disregard safety or ethics was immediately declared not to have passed, without considering other aspects.

B. SCOPE OF CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION

Clinical practice evaluations include the entire flow of the hypnotherapy session, from beginning to end, without any part being skipped.

1. OPENING & CLINICAL RAPPORT

At this stage, participants are assessed on their abilities:

• Greet clients professionally
• Explaining the roles of therapist and client
• Avoiding exaggerated claims
• Build a sense of security and trust

Indicators of failure at this stage include:

• Using suggestive manipulative language
• Giving the promise of healing
• Displaying a superior or patronizing attitude

Participants must demonstrate a stable, calm, and ethical therapeutic presence.

2. CLINICAL INTAKE & DATA MINING

Participants are evaluated on their ability to carry out systematic intake, including:

• Digging into the client's main complaints
• Identify the duration and intensity of the problem
• Digging into triggers and patterns
• Identifying relevant psychological history

Assessment focuses on:

• Accuracy of questions
• Active listening skills
• Do not direct the client's answer
• Do not make diagnoses outside of competence

Participants who immediately “jump to conclusions” without adequate data will lose big points.

3. READINESS ASSESSMENT & CONTRAINDICATIONS

This is safety critical point. Participants are assessed on their abilities:

• Assess the client's mental readiness
• Identifying psychological red flags
• Determining whether hypnosis is worth pursuing
• Postpone or decline sessions if necessary

Immediate failure indicators:

• Ignoring signs of severe dissociation
• Forcing hypnosis on an unstable client
• Not understanding the limits of one's own competence

Participant more appreciated when declining a session ethically rather than forcing practices.

4. EXPLANATION OF THE PROCESS & INFORMED CONSENT

Participants must be able to:

• Explaining the process of hypnosis realistically
• Dispelling client myths and fears
• Answer client questions honestly
• Obtain the client's informed consent

The assessment focuses on:

• Honesty
• Transparency
• Easy to understand language

Exaggerated or manipulative claims immediately invalidate the practical graduation.

5. IMPLEMENTATION OF HYPNOSIS INDUCTION

Induction is judged not on the type of technique, but on:

• Suitability to client conditions
• Suggestion language security
• Tempo and voice stability
• Responsiveness to clients

Participants are not required to use any particular technique, however must adapt the approach to the client.

Fatal errors include:

• Ignoring client signs of discomfort
• Forcing deepening
• Using potentially harmful suggestions

6. DEEPENING & CLIENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT

Participants are evaluated on their abilities:

• Manage the depth of hypnosis
• Maintain therapeutic control
• Handle resistance safely
• Not chasing depth for ego's sake

Participants who pursue “deep trance” without a clear clinical goal will miss out on significant value.

7. THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION

At this stage, participants are assessed in:

• Intervention accuracy
• Alignment with client goals
• Clarity of suggestion
• Does not violate ethical boundaries

Interventions are assessed based on:

• Clinical logic
• Alignment with intake
• Psychological safety

Participant not required to solve client problems, but must demonstrate correct and safe processes.

 

8. TERMINATION & GROUNDING

Termination is a mandatory part that is often overlooked. Participants must be able to:

• Returning the client to full consciousness
• Maintain client's emotional stability
• Provides simple grounding
• Not leave clients in a fragile state

Mistakes at this stage include:

• Hasty termination
• Ignoring the client's emotional state
• No reorientation

9. POST-SESSION BRIEFING

Participants are assessed on their abilities:

• Explain what has been done
• Convey realistic expectations
• Provide post-session guidance
• Does not create dependency

C. CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION METHODS

Evaluation of clinical practice is carried out using the following methods:

1. Direct Observation by Assessor

The assessor observes the entire process without intervention, using a standardized observation sheet.

2. Structured Client Simulation

Participants face simulated clients with specific scenarios to assess competency consistency.

3. Video Review (if needed)

For further evaluation, sessions are recorded and reviewed objectively.

D. Clinical Practice Assessment Rubric

Assessed Aspects	Weight
Safety & Ethics	30%
Clinical Process Flow	25%
Communication Skills	15%
Intervention Accuracy	20%
Termination & Follow-Up	10%

Minimum passing score: 80/100
Value below 75 on safety or ethics = TOTAL FAILURE

E. Criteria for Passing & Failing Clinical Practice

PASS if the participant:

• Maintain client safety
• Following the correct clinical flow
• Act ethically and professionally
• Demonstrates emotional stability

NOT PASS if the participant:

• Forcing technique
• Ignoring red flags
• Being manipulative
• Pursuing the therapeutic ego

EVALUATION OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OF THERAPIST ATTITUDE, PERSONAL INTEGRITY, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MATURITY

In clinical hypnosis practice, technical competence without ethics is a serious risk. Therefore, Hypnosis Indonesia places an evaluation of professional ethics and psychological maturity parallel or even higher compared to technical skills. This is in line with the international principles applied by global professional organizations of hypnosis and mental health, where client safety, therapist integrity, and professional boundaries is the main foundation of practice.

Hypnosis Indonesia confirmed that a person can be technically proficient but still not be worthy of graduating if they do not demonstrate adequate professionalism, emotional maturity and personal integrity.

A. PROFESSIONAL ETHICAL BASIS IN INDONESIAN HYPNOSIS

The ethical framework of Indonesian Hypnosis is designed by integrating the general principles of ethical practice from international organizations, including:

• International Association of Counselors and Therapists (IACT)
• National Guild of Hypnotists (NGH)
• General Hypnotherapy Standards Council (GHSC)
• American Hypnosis Association (AHA)

However, Hypnosis Indonesia developed standards that more contextual and applicable, adapted to the cultural, legal and dynamic realities of clients in Indonesia, without compromising on the strictness of international standards.

B. PURPOSE OF ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL MATURITY EVALUATION

The evaluation of ethics and psychological maturity has the following main objectives:

1. Protecting clients from hypnosis abuse
2. Ensuring the therapist understands the boundaries of his or her role and authority
3. Assessing the therapist's emotional stability and self-regulation
4. Prevent manipulative, exploitative, or narcissistic practices
5. Maintaining the collective reputation of the hypnosis profession

Maintaining the collective reputation of the hypnosis profession determine graduation directly.

C. ETHICAL DIMENSIONS EVALUATED

Professional ethics evaluation is carried out multidimensional, including attitudes, behavior, decisions, and consistency of values.

1. AWARENESS OF COMPETENCE BOUNDARIES (SCOPE OF PRACTICE)

Participants are evaluated on their understanding and application of competency limits, including:

• Know the conditions that can be treated
• Knowing the conditions that need to be referred
• No medical or psychiatric diagnosis
• Do not claim abilities outside of training

Failed indicators:

• Claiming to be able to cure serious disorders
• Belittling other health professions
• Using clinical terms without formal competence

2. THE PRINCIPLE OF TRUE INFORMED CONSENT

The evaluation assesses whether participants:

• Explain the process honestly
• Do not mislead clients
• Doesn't promise results
• Give clients space to refuse

Informed consent that is manipulative or subtly pressured considered a serious offence.

3. HEALTHY PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS

Participants are assessed on their ability to maintain professional relationships, including:

• Does not create emotional dependency
• Does not involve personal or romantic relationships
• Do not exploit client conditions
• Maintaining a healthy professional distance

Dual relationship without risk awareness is indicators of professional unfitness.

4. PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY AND HONESTY

Evaluation includes:

• Honesty in practice reports
• Do not manipulate results
• Not claiming false success
• Recognizing one's limitations

Participants who cover up mistakes or blame the client will was immediately declared a failure.

5. POWER MANAGEMENT (POWER DYNAMICS)

Hypnosis creates power asymmetry between therapist and client. Participants are assessed on:

• Awareness of positions of authority
• Do not abuse suggestions
• Does not instill personal values
• Does not exercise psychological control

Unawareness of power dynamics is considered latent danger in the practice of hypnosis.

D. EVALUATION OF THE THERAPIST'S PSYCHOLOGICAL MATURITY

Apart from formal ethics, Hypnosis Indonesia assesses the therapist's internal condition, because this condition greatly affects the quality and safety of therapy.

1. EMOTIONAL REGULATION AND MENTAL STABILITY

Participants are evaluated on:

• Ability to manage stress
• Response to criticism
• Emotional stability when dealing with difficult clients
• Not overly reactive or defensive

Emotional outbursts, extreme defensiveness, or aggression be an indicator of immaturity.

2. MOTIVATION TO BECOME A THERAPIST

The assessor assesses whether the participant's motivation:

• The assessor assesses whether the participant's motivation:
• Professionally oriented
• Or driven by ego, power, or the need for validation

Ego-centric motivation without self-awareness cancel graduation, because of the high risk of hypnosis abuse.

3. SELF-AWARENESS AND PROFESSIONAL HUMILITY

Participants are assessed on:

• Participants are assessed on:
• Willingness to learn and improve oneself
• Not feeling “the most correct”
• Don't denigrate other approaches

Professional arrogance is red flag serius.

E. ETHICS & MATURITY EVALUATION METHODS

Evaluation is carried out through a combination of the following methods:

1. Behavioral Observation Throughout Training

The assessor assesses the consistency of the participant's attitude from the beginning to the end of the program.

2. Structured Ethics Interview

Participants are tested through ethical dilemma scenarios, for example:

• Client requests therapy beyond competence
• The client shows dependency
• Severely traumatized client requests deep regression

Assessment focuses on way of thinking, not memorized answers.

3. PROFESSIONAL WRITTEN REFLECTION

Participants are asked to write reflections regarding:

• Limits of self as a therapist
• Risks of hypnosis practice
• Professional responsibility

Shallow or defensive reflections decrease significant value.

F. ETHICS & MATURITY ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

Assessed Aspects	Weight
Ethical Awareness	30%
Professional Integrity	25%
Emotion Regulation	20%
Self-awareness	15%
Behavioral Consistency	10%

Minimum passing score: 85/100
Value below 80 on ethical aspects = TOTAL FAILURE

G. PASS & FAIL CRITERIA

PASS if the participant:

• Demonstrate high integrity
• Maintain professional boundaries
• Emotionally stable
• Have healthy motivation

NOT PASS if the participant:

• Manipulative or narcissistic
• Ignoring the limits of competence
• Emotionally unstable
• Using hypnosis for personal ego

FINAL GRADUATION CRITERIA FOR THE REMEDIATION SYSTEM, CERTIFICATION, & PROFESSIONAL THERAPIST STANDARDS

This page is ultimate and fastener the entire Hypnosis Indonesia evaluation system. After participants have passed the academic theoretical evaluation (Page 2), clinical practice evaluation (Page 3), and ethics and psychological maturity evaluation (Page 4), the final stage is determination of professional graduation.

Hypnosis Indonesia confirmed that graduation is not just an accumulation of grades, but rather graduation is not just an accumulation of grades who considers public safety, professional reputation, and the moral responsibility of the institution.

A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING FINAL GRADUATION

Determination of final graduation in Hypnosis Indonesia is based on the following principles:

1. Integrated Competency Principle
   Participants must pass all evaluation domains, not excel in one aspect and be weak in another.
2. Safety & Ethics Override Rule
   High marks in theory or practice cannot cover up failures in safety and ethical aspects.
3. Professional Readiness Standard
   cannot cover up failures in safety and ethical aspects ready to practice professionally safely, not just “smart enough.”
4. Collective Assessor Decision
   Graduation is determined through the decision of a team of assessors, not a single individual.

These principles are in line with international standards adopted by:

• International Association of Counselors and Therapists (IACT)
• National Guild of Hypnotists (NGH)
• General Hypnotherapy Standards Council (GHSC)
• American Hypnosis Association (AHA)

B. MANDATORY COMPONENTS FOR FINAL GRADUATION

A participant MUST fulfill all of the following components to be declared as having passed Hypnosis Indonesia Professional Hypnosis Therapist.

1. ACADEMIC THEORETICAL EVALUATION PASS

• Minimum value: 75/100
• There are no substandard scores in the following aspects:
  • Ethics
  • Safety
  • Contraindication

Participants who passed the theory but demonstrated dangerous misconceptions can still be dropped at the final stage.

2. PASSING CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION

• Minimum value: 80/100
• There were no safety violations
• No manipulative practices
• The clinical flow was assessed as safe and logical.

Fatal errors in practice (e.g., forcing traumatized clients, dangerous suggestions, or unsafe termination) to abort graduation without immediate remediation.

3. PASSING THE EVALUATION OF ETHICS & PSYCHOLOGICAL MATURITY

• Minimum value: 85/100
• There were no serious ethical violations.
• There is no indication of abuse of power
• There is no dominant ego-centric motivation

This aspect is non-compromise.

C. FINAL COMPETENCY REVIEW

After all evaluations are completed, Hypnosis Indonesia will hold Final Assessment Hearing, which functions as the ultimate professional filter.

Session Composition:

• Minimum 2 senior clinical assessors
• 1 representative of ethics & quality training
• 1 academic coordinator (no conflict of interest)

FOCUS OF THE HEARING:

• Consistency of participant competency
• Behavior patterns during training
• Potential risks if participants are released to the public
• Mental and professional readiness

The trial does not only read the value numbers, but evaluate humans as a whole.

D. PARTICIPANT PASSING STATUS

Based on the results of the trial, participants will obtain one of the following four statuses:

1. Full Pass (Certified Professional Hypnotherapist)

Awarded to participants who:

• Pass all evaluations
• Emotionally stable
• Worthy of independent practice
• Demonstrate professional integrity

Participants are entitled to receive Professional Therapist Hypnosis Indonesia Certificate.

2. CONDITIONAL PASS

Awarded to participants who:

• Generally competent
• Has minor weaknesses that can be improved
• Does not involve any serious safety or ethical aspects

Participant required to follow specific remediation before the final certificate is issued.

3. DEFERRED GRADUATION

Awarded to participants who:

• Has potential
• But not ready clinically or emotionally
• Requires in-depth study and maturation

Participant not failed, but not yet suitable for public release.

4. NOT CERTIFIED

Awarded to participants who:

• Violating serious ethics
• Clinically unsafe
• Does not demonstrate professional maturity
• Having dangerous motivations

this decision final and binding.

E. PROFESSIONAL REMEDIATION SYSTEM

Remediation in Hypnosis Indonesia not a formality, but rather a serious relearning process.

Forms of Remediation:

• Repetition of certain modules
• Additional practice supervision
• Written ethical reflection
• Re-observation of clinical practice

Remediation not available for serious ethical violations or risks to client safety.

F. CERTIFICATION OF HYPNOSIS INDONESIA PROFESSIONAL HYPNOSIS THERAPISTS

Participants who pass the full test will receive:

1. Professional Hypnosis Therapist Certificate
2. Internal registration number
3. The right to declare graduation from Hypnosis Indonesia
4. Obligation to maintain code of ethics and quality of practice

Certificates are available revoked if the therapist is proven to have violated serious ethics in the future.

G. STANDARDS FOR PROFESSIONAL HYPNOSIS THERAPISTS IN INDONESIA

A professional Indonesian Hypnosis therapist MUST:

• Prioritize client safety
• Maintaining competency limits
• Continue to increase your capacity
• Do not abuse hypnosis
• Maintain the good name of the profession

Therapist status is public trust, not just a title.

H. CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE DOCUMENT

With this document, Hypnosis Indonesia declares that:

Not everyone who learns hypnosis is qualified to be a therapist.
However, every therapist who is passed by Hypnosis Indonesia is worthy of public trust.

This document becomes official, binding, and operational reference in the entire process of evaluation, assessment, and graduation of Indonesian Hypnosis students.